Search for: "People v Long"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 19,527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
The thing is, this won't take long. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
The thing is, this won't take long. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
There was no evidence as to how many of these people read one or more of the articles. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:57 pm
It is one, of course, that long time readers know I've touched on often. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
Long Mtn. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:51 am
This exact scenario in the example was upheld in the case of Shapira v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:04 pm
However, monetary policy affects the economy with a lag, and to paraphrase the Nobel laureate Milton Friedman, a lag that is both long and variable. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
The main difference between Nokia v IPCom is this, though: the characters in soap operas are not real people: their often bizarre and chaotic responses to the positions in which they find themselves are scripted and deprive them of any freedom of action. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 2:59 pm
It seems everyone has put forth their opinion on the impact of Herring v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:36 am
Court of Appeals in Clark v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:08 pm
In Balderas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm
Sterling access to the evidence which, when eventually obtained, helped prove his innocence.So it was kind of shocking to see that in People v Woodrich (4th dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, cited its decision in Sterling as the authority for rejection another inmates' motion for DNA testing:County Court properly denied the motion “because defendant failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, had those items been tested [further] and… [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:51 am
The frequency and long duration of the unhindered flagrant infringement by MNL also weighed heavily on the FHC’s mind. [read post]
