Search for: "People v. Case" Results 1741 - 1760 of 52,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
In many cases people do this without really understanding the consequences of what they are doing.The problems of using joint tenancies with children are again illustrated in a recent British Columbia case, Turner v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am by ISOBELLE WILLIAMS
Perhaps that indicates how long the case has been in the courts. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
  The Court also unanimously remanded People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am by INFORRM
  The test is not how many people in fact accessed the photograph but how many relevant persons might have. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:16 pm by INFORRM
The cases are as follows: Morar v Romania (App no. 25217/06) [2015] ECHR 668 (French only), Judgment of 7 July 2015, Third Section. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:08 am by Orin Kerr
On November 13, the Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Fernandez v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am by Andrew Hamm
” Primus observed that the Supreme Court in the 1883 case Pace v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:00 pm
”That must have dogged them all.# # #DECISIONC. v O'R. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Of course, this case may be difficult in the current political context: for example, the politics of Roe v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 11:56 pm
The Court explained that "we have held that 'a defendant who does not rest after the court fails to grant a motion to dismiss at the close of the People's case, proceeds with the risk that he will inadvertently supply a deficiency in the people's case.' Thus, a defendant who presents evidence after a court has declined to grant a trial motion to dismiss made at the close of the People's case waives subsequent review… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:31 am by Philip Thomas
This is not good news for people hoping that the Mississippi Supreme Court will strike Mississippi's caps in the Sears case. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:55 am
  The California Supreme Court unanimously affirms.Tough to say that this case is any worse than your typical murder-of-police-officers case. [read post]