Search for: "People v. House"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2016, 10:35 am
People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:42 am
Grenci v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:47 am
Prah v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
I don't know how I feel about that - it's not really to do with my pacifism but about whether the case for their additional priority is necessarily made out over those other serious needs. vii) And then there's a raft of other stuff which is much less sexy (to me) - more on empty homes (snore - see my previous comment on the previous announcements); the green deal; the co-ordination of debt advice by Money Advice Service; a new deal for older people's housing… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
I don't know how I feel about that - it's not really to do with my pacifism but about whether the case for their additional priority is necessarily made out over those other serious needs. vii) And then there's a raft of other stuff which is much less sexy (to me) - more on empty homes (snore - see my previous comment on the previous announcements); the green deal; the co-ordination of debt advice by Money Advice Service; a new deal for older people's housing… [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm
He's going to continue to do everything that he can to make sure that we protect people's freedoms. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:58 am
EEOC v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:50 am
Should Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm
Jeannette Cockroft has reviewed Keira V. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:12 am
Greenspan v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:04 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am
” The court brought up US v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Why Are Multiple People On A Deed In Illinois Both spouses on a deed to a house makes a lot of sense! [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm
” [Promatek v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 7:26 am
The defendant’s marketing featured its house mark BagSpot extensively, which helps inform consumers that they aren’t dealing with the plaintiff. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
” Nixon v. [read post]
