Search for: "People v. Kennedy"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Briefly: Following Lucia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am
Question: You offer a nuanced look at Justice Anthony Kennedy’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
Louisiana, holding that Miller v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:48 am
When any enforcement officer encounters a situation in which there will be “First Amendment activity”– that is, people speaking out — it would be “legitimate” for them to take what people say into account in deciding whether to make an arrest, the government lawyer suggested. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
V 16. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s oral argument on Tuesday in Perry v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:20 am
Roe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:35 pm
Florence v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:19 pm
This case may not appear to present such an injustice, but it is a reiteration of Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 1:14 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes offers “a reminder of the real people behind the court’s cases” with a profile of Jason Pepper, the petitioner in Pepper v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:06 am
Although no case like Lochner v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 2:59 am
” This provision, according to lead sponsors Senators Edward Kennedy and Orrin Hatch, was included in RLUIPA because “[z]oning codes frequently exclude churches in places where they permit theaters, meetings halls, and other places where large groups of people assemble for secular purposes. . . . [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:58 am
For more information on Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:13 pm
District Court Judge Joseph Tauro in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:01 am
is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
