Search for: "People v. Richard"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 3,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 4:25 am
The board reasoned that Stephen’s agreement with Family Dollar prohibited Mamie from seeking death benefits, as her claim was derivative of his.The Court of Appeals disagreed and vacated the board's decision on Friday based on a state Supreme Court case from 1930, called Brashear v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
Sheehan, in which the Court will consider the duties that the Americans with Disabilities Act imposes on police officers when they deal with people with mental disabilities. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am
” Also at PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re discusses the Court’s opinion in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
News: Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications, Final Submissions in Federal Treasurer’s defamation trial
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am
Hockey’s barrister Bruce McClintock SC has more than once been reprimanded by Justice Richard White for his legal flourishes and personal slights. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
As a Legal Post article discussing Tossonian v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:03 pm
[Legal Cheek] * King v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:46 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:06 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re weighs in on last week’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Beginning in 2001 (with Dunmore v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
Other coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today and Lawrence Hurley of Reuters. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:39 am
He focuses rightly on the seminal case of American Waltham Watch Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Sconnie Nation LLC Doesn’t Conflict with Cariou v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:19 pm
The Supreme Court in Branzburg v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Here to lead readers through the case is solicitor and long-time Katfriend Richard Kempner, who explains as follows:In Fresh v Deepend the courts found in favour of Fresh (the people behind the Innocent smoothie brand), in its hotly-contested action as to who owns the copyright in the ‘Dude’ (the stylised face with halo, right), the logo used by Innocent for the past 15 years on all its smoothie bottles. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:01 am
,” chapter by Mark Steiner People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
Landes and Richard A. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
