Search for: "People v. Roberts" Results 1741 - 1760 of 6,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2021, 12:28 pm by Amy Howe
The case, Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
But the Roberts court has shown no interest in such limitations, and, in Burwell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm by Lauren Bateman
So far as this post goes, that will mean time-traveling back to two historical documents: first, 2005 congressional testimony by then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and then-FBI Director Robert Mueller III, regarding the renewal of the government’s surveillance authorities; and second, to a 2006 legal filing, submitted under Gonzales’ name to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (“FISC”). [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
A Petition entitled “Exploiting People in the Public Eye” has been launched demanding new and stricter laws to safeguard people in the public eye and has attracted over 150,000 signatures. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
With Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito now firmly ensconsed, we might be on the verge of a significant paradigm-shift within the Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Barrett points out the influence of Professor Robert Cushman on Justice Elena Kagan’s dissenting opinion in Seila Law v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:13 pm by The Blog Team
” Or, as Chief Justice Roberts recently put it, “[o]ur law punishes people for what they do, not who they are. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by James Romoser
The justices return to the virtual bench for oral arguments, starting Monday at 10 a.m. with Pham v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Apple v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” In a paper available at SSRN, Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle suggest that the majority opinion in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]