Search for: "RICHARDS v. RICHARDS" Results 1741 - 1760 of 13,656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 2 December 2020 Richard Spearman QC handed down judgment in the case of Sadler v Joyner [2020] EWHC 3325 (QB) after the trial of a preliminary issue on meaning. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In Antony & anr v Sivakumar, Richard Spearman QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, delivered an ex tempore judgment in which he ordered the defendant to pay both claimants £15,000 in damages. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 6:29 am by James Romoser
Earlier this year, the court decided in Ramos v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am by Anna Salvatore
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:34 am by Frantzeska Papadopoulou
The applicant had previously, on September 20, 2018, been granted such an injunction by  Justice Richard Arnold (as he was at the time) , but that order had  expired on the 1st of October 2020, by virtue of a “sunset clause” contained in the order. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
   He has also given several other important privacy judgments, including Sir Cliff Richard v BBC [2019] Ch 169. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 10:19 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Certain retirees are not subject to court-martial jurisdiction, so says Judge Richard J. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
" This exceedingly rigorous, subtle, and well-researched book has major implications for understanding the interplay among law, society, culture, and politics not only in modern China but also in many places with similarly complicated experiences with modernity.An honorable mention went to Elizabeth Papp Kamali (Harvard Law School) for Felony and the Guilty Mind in Medieval England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Members of this year's Stein Award committee were Li Chen… [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by INFORRM
In Seventy Thirty Limited v Burki [2018] EWHC 2151 (QB), the much publicised libel case about the disappointing dating agency,  HHJ Richard Parkes QC accepted that serious financial loss had been established where one client and his fees had been lost to a very small company. [read post]