Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 1741 - 1760 of 14,897
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Specifically, in the recent case of Worsoff v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Michigan cases dealing with business corporations confirm the states continuing commitment to Dodge. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:25 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This Week in the Supreme Court – w/c 25th April 2022 Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 6:14 pm by Russell Knight
“[W]hen an objection is made, specific grounds must be stated and other grounds not stated are waived on review” Jones v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 6:58 am by Unreported Opinions
Worker’s compensation — Motion to exclude testimony — Treating physician Allied Propane and The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (collectively “Allied”) appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Cecil County, the Honorable William W. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To see why, it helps to begin with what has been the most important administrative law case for nearly four decades.In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” USERRA’s cause of action against state employers may be pursued only in state courts, which a Texas court found to be unconstitutional because Congress lacks the power to authorize lawsuits against nonconsenting states pursuant to its War Powers. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney is liable under Judiciary Law § 487(1) if he or she “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party,” and under Judiciary Law § 487(2) if he or she “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 12; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at… [read post]