Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
United States: Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (NAFTA Arb.), with introductory Note by Ronald J. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by K.O. Herston
“If the Campbells had named their son ‘R2D2,’ state authorities would have intervened,” Carlton Larson, a law professor at the University of California, Davis wrote in a 2011 study of United States baby names. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But Kozinski was dissenting in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Nick Basciano
 Jane posted a summary of two United States Signals Intelligence Directives (USSID) continuing Lawfare’s coverage of the latest ODNI declassification trove. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:57 am by Florian Mueller
A reversal of this finding will result in a remand of the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Another Reason to be Thankful — Energy Poverty in the United States – Philadelphia attorney Linda Evers of Stevens & Lee on the firm’s blog, Smart Grid Legal News NYU Acknowledges Bargaining Rights of Grad Students – Atlanta attorney Cary Burke of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Labor Relations Today Law Firm Merger Diligence–Are the Financial Metrics Compatible? [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed), and my students Nate Barrett, Garry Padrta, and Scott Sia worked on the brief. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am by John Elwood
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Rickard 12-1117Issue: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit wrongly denied qualified immunity to the petitioners by analyzing whether the force used in 2004 was distinguishable from factually similar force ruled permissible three years later in Scott v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]