Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE." Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm by Josh Blackman
See, e.g., Brief for State of Mississippi et al. as Amici Curiae 7–10; Ante, at 1–2 (GORSUCH, J., dissenting). [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm by admin
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
If the Food and Drug Administration bans menthol cigarettes, federal and state governments, combined, stand to lose more than $6.6 billion in the first full year following prohibition. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
  Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Pace Law School Library
:  the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 8:03 am by Eric Goldman
. * Kendra Albert et al, FOSTA in Legal Context (2020). [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 137 S.Ct. 810 (2017)Ricky HENSON, et al., petitioners,v.SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., et al.No. 16-349.Supreme Court of United States.January 13, 2017.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.RICKY HENSON, ET AL., Petitioners,v.SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.No. 16-349.Supreme Court of the United States.Argued April 18, 2017.Decided June 12, 2017.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm by Kelsey Farish
Disney has responded to the copyright lawsuit lodged earlier this year in California by the Estate of Michael Jackson (MJJ Productions (et al) v Walt Disney Company and ABC INC). [read post]