Search for: "STATE v MURPHY"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm
On March 31, the Supreme Court heard argument in the case of NCAA v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Murphy. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
Notably, Judge Newman dissented, stating that “failure to adhere closely to ba [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:35 pm
Saenz, president and general counsel of MALDEF, which led the fight in Plyler v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 9:32 am
In Resurrection School v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 1:07 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
First up was Trump v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:37 am
Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984); parental status termination hearings, Lassiter v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Andrepont v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Pritchard (1998), ‘United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Murphy, 521 U. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
Brooks and James Bernard Murphy. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
This decision, Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 (discussed here), found that s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, which had been in operation for the past 36 years having been inserted by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976, was contrary to the Constitution. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
Mazerbo v Murphy, 52 AD3d 1064, 1066). [read post]
