Search for: "STATE v. WISE" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2013, 5:21 pm by Adam Santucci
As such, in accordance with the Supreme Court of the United States' holding in New Process Steel v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has long emphasized, as it explained in Flast v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
 This is where the excellent Francis Davey -- a noted contributor of wise and generally rectificatory comments on other people's weblogs -- comes in. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:49 am
Defendant Johnson was the only defendant served and he wisely moved to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:56 pm by Pamela Wolf
Employers may be wise to follow the lead of the Fortune 500 and ensure that LGBT employees and applicants are protected from employment discrimination through internal policies before the EEOC — or its state counterparts — come knocking on their doors. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:37 am by Michelle Yeary
  That’s precisely the scenario that prompted the case of Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am by Marty Lederman
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 6:33 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Thursday, January 17, 2013:#Ottawapiskat Sheriffs, state lawmakers push back on Obama gun control initiatives "AvoidAClaim" Blog | Self-Represented Litigants: A Survival Guide by Carol Cochrane Attorney, had affair with divorce client, billed her for time they spent having sex Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Over the weekend, the White House wisely ruled out the “Big Coin” gambit, which would have had the government mint two one-trillion dollar platinum coins, and which was inexplicably being promoted by some prominent liberals. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 8:26 am by Rory Little
”  But Justices Breyer and Sotomayor both suggested that, if the state got this factor in the Barker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 2:00 am by Catherine Coulter
  In particular, section 9 of the ESA states that if a purchaser hires an employee of a vendor within 13 weeks of closing, the purchaser will be deemed to have taken on the employee with all of his or her prior years of service with the vendor. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:04 am by Jay Wexler
  At this point, with the advice of an ex-editor friend of mine, I decided to reframe the issue once more, into a short book about the history of the bald eagle as a symbol in the United States. [read post]