Search for: "SULLIVAN V. SULLIVAN"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 4,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 6:31 am
Moreover, he maintains, the Supreme Court’s case law on this question is unsettled: although the Court in Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" In papers, plaintiff theorizes that the previous cases mentioned are examples of an "extraordinarily speech-protective law" emerging from the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times Co. v Sullivan. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:30 pm
– Washington, DC lawyer David Evans of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Branding Extremes: Panda Cheese v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am
On July 11, 2014, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v Loudermilk (here) that the common law of Georgia recognizes the business judgment rule and that the rule has not been superseded by Georgia statutory law. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:29 pm
Reed v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
When approached for comment, Jonathan Lisus at Lax O’Sullivan Scott Lisus LLP, who represented the Center for Addiction and Mental Health in the case, quickly confirmed his client has agreed to a re-hearing. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
The court declined, however, to adopt the magistrate’s determination to the extent that she found that a desk audit was equivalent to an administrative subpoena for the purposes of Fourth Amendment analysis and that the OFCCP did not apply neutral administrative criteria for selecting a certain BOA branch location for a compliance review (Bank of Am v Solis, July 2, 2014, Sullivan, E). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:24 am
The court declined, however, to adopt the magistrate’s determination to the extent that she found that a desk audit was equivalent to an administrative subpoena for the purposes of Fourth Amendment analysis and that the OFCCP did not apply neutral administrative criteria for selecting a certain BOA branch location for a compliance review (Bank of Am v Solis, July 2, 2014, Sullivan, E). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm
While Bond v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:13 pm
Sullivan, titled "The Press and the Constitution 50 Years After New York Times v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:14 am
First, in Harris v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Sullivan... [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Edwin Williamson is Of Counsel at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964). [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:20 am
In Under Seal v. [read post]
