Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 1741 - 1760
of 6,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 5:17 am
" Rebecca Curtin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
Never too late 24 [week ending Sunday 14 December] -- ** INTA’s When Trademarks Overlap With Other IP Rights Special ** | Scottish Law Society misinforms about UPC in Scotland | EPO Enlarged BoA Members’ letter against against President Battistelli’s BoA Member’s house ban | German lititgator writes German delegate to EPO AC | EU Judges join the chorus of condemnation against President Battistelli | EPO replies to multilarelal… [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:06 am
And then there was Osei-Bonsu v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1999] 1 All ER 265. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Reputation was inferred from substantial sales and marketing by the applicant. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:56 pm
The August 7, 2019 Court of Appeals opinion in Thompson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:15 am
Bonds v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 2:26 pm
This week the Ontario Court of Appeal released a much awaited decision in the case of Westerhof v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:04 pm
& C. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:39 am
Chattem, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:00 am
Sales of Goods Left Standing by Supreme Court’s Affirmance by Equally Divided Court (0) U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
Panayiotou v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2017) EWCA Civ 1624 This is an important court of appeal decision on the meaning of ‘significantly’ in Lord Neuberger’s definition of vulnerability under s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996 in Hotak v Southwark LBC (2015) UKSC 30, [2016] AC 811 (our report). [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:10 am
The terms of the sale were protected, and the expectation of profit if the software had been properly sold was within the statute's purview. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:12 am
Vega v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
This was stated in Best Buy v Worldwide Sales Corporation [2000]FSR 686, in which Floyd J expressed concern about “exporting” the threats provisions overseas. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Indeed, in today’s South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:42 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The confiscation order’s interference with Art. 1 Protocol 1 The first step of the ECtHR’s analysis required the assessment of whether the Getty Trust could claim a proprietary interest in Victorious Youth in the first place and whether the confiscation measure could interfere with such right. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am
An appeal to the Supreme Court was denied (455 U.S. 1019 (1982). ) So with that victory under its belt, Topps sued Fleer in 1982 stating that the latter company had been “unjustly enriched” by its sale of baseball cards in the period between Fleer’s 1980 victory and the 1981 reversal. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
Sales, 22 M.J. 305, 308 (C.M.A. 1986); United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:13 am
Coach Services v. [read post]
