Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 1741 - 1760 of 6,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2018, 2:58 am by Peter Mahler
If you answered slim or none, you’d be right in the case of Gourary v Laster, 2016 NY Slip Op 04287 [1st Dept June 12, 2018], where the absence of testimony by the two deceased principals and the deceased lawyer for one of them doomed a lawsuit by the executor of the estate of an enfeebled 50% shareholder who, about six months before he died, sold for $5.75 million his 50% stake in a realty holding company to the other 50% shareholder’s son-in-law… [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/RJPqBMzsTw 2018-07-10 Amazon Again Avoids Liability for Defective Marketplace Item–Fox v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm by Bona Law PC
Author: Jarod Bona In an antitrust case deciding a non-antitrust-specific issue, the US Supreme Court held in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm by Bona Law PC
Author: Jarod Bona In an antitrust case deciding a non-antitrust-specific issue, the US Supreme Court held in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm by The Ansara Law Firm
  If you want to legally purchase fireworks for public display, the buyer and seller actually need permits, but that is not what typically happens. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm by The Ansara Law Firm
  If you want to legally purchase fireworks for public display, the buyer and seller actually need permits, but that is not what typically happens. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]