Search for: "Smith v. People" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,931
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2016, 7:06 pm by Howard Friedman
Smith (1990) which rejected use of the "compelling interest" test to validate neutral regulations of general applicability that burden religious practices. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am by UK Supreme Court Yearbook
The first two articles are from quite possibly the most authoritative people who could speak about the Yearbook—i.e., the President and Deputy President of the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 2:48 pm
A California court later said as much (see Central Valley General Hospital v Smith (2008)). [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Jennifer Davis
Kilmer, Erika Jean Pribanic-Smith, Debra Reddin van Tuyll, Janice R. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Florida, 15-6075, and Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan banned stun guns until 2012; the repeal followed a trial court decision holding the statute unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, and People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 11:23 am by John Floyd
Supreme Court passed on an opportunity to settle this tension in early 2012, when it avoided the question in Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Smith’s case has hit a speed bump on the GVR highway. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:38 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The new movie Concussion, starring Will Smith, focuses on how repeated hard hits to the head can result in serious concussions. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Charles Smith’s discrete testimony had allegedly contributed to a number of miscarriages of justice relating to infant deaths. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner has reaffirmed the need for stronger sentencing powers for people convicted of stealing personal data. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Old Fox
============================================Some interesting background here on the Citizens United v. [read post]