Search for: "Spells v. Spells" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
The Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe, the court of appeal, had decided in favour of the claimant and had taken the view that the slight differences in the spelling of the marks (Thermoroll v Termorol) were not significant enough to mislead consumers and so fell out of the ambit of the Unfair Competition Act. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:16 am by Peter Mahler
Bucaria (photo right) in Abatemarco v Abatemarco, Index No. 6455/13, presents a smorgasbord of noteworthy issues in a dispute between two brothers over a buy-out gone wrong involving their 50/50 interests in an advertising firm and the separate realty company that owns the building housing the advertising firm’s office. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:20 pm by Ronald Mann
It looked bleak for petitioner Baker Botts from the earliest moments of the argument yesterday in Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:28 am by SHG
The Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:44 am by SHG
From the bench, Chief Justice John Roberts asked in Fisher v. [read post]