Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 10:29 am
Without comment, it refused a plea by state officials in North Carolina to restore a law requiring ultrasound displays before an abortion could go ahead. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
United States, 2015 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
For the first time since this crusty old man was on the bar mitzvah circuit, the United States has a Triple Crown winner. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:46 am
Mississippi and North Carolina are the only two states in which “alienation of affections” claims are regularly brought; under this tort — which was once recognized almost everywhere in the United States — spouse A can sue spouse B’s lover for “alienating the spouse’s affections” and undermining or destroying A’s and B’s marriage. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, and Davis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
By Jared Klaus and Allen Carter State bar associations and other licensing boards were left like bleeding seals in shark-infested waters following the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision this February in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
In North Carolina: William Davie: “Every member will agree that the positive regulations ought to be carried into execution, and that the negative restrictions ought not to [be] disregarded or violated. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Barnes, 14-395, a state-on-top habeas case involving jurors who received third-party religious advice on the death penalty, asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:56 am
The seminal case in this area is United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:27 pm
The North Carolina Court of Appeals applied that principle this week in State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:11 am
United States, 45 F. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
