Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 27,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2008, 8:15 am
Class Action Fairness Act lawyers know that 28 U.S.C. s. 1453(c)(1), the appeal provision of CAFA, states that application to appeal a remand order must be made "not less than 7 days after entry of the order. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
To be fair, the law was seriously flawed. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:07 am
” Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:54 pm
A federal judge's role is to state what the law is, and apply it faithfully. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:11 am
Baumann v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
It stated clearly in 1994 in Campbell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
It stated clearly in 1994 in Campbell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
It stated clearly in 1994 in Campbell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
Pa. 2007), and Bond v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
United States, holds Apprendi v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 11:30 am
I think it's fair to say that no attorney wants the Court of Appeal to call him or her a liar in a published opinion. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 3:16 pm
Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:55 pm
New York has always been a regressive State for insurance claims. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:20 am
Still waiting on the very ripe cases of Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:18 am
Fair Isaac Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:01 am
Evidence concerning a Tel Aviv suicide bombing, which was noted during a wedding ceremony one defendant attended, and evidence about an Al-Qaeda training camp was unfairly prejudicial under FRE 403, and deprived the defendants of a fair trial, in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
The case is Schuh v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:39 pm
The employers appealed, and the Ninth Circuit reversed:Defendants removed this putative class action from state court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA),FN1 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
(09-1298) and Boeing Co. v. [read post]