Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 8:11 pm
In Mosleh et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:53 am
, Lops v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
The amendment establishes a rebuttable presumption in favor of the right-holder as long as its name/pseudonym appears linked to the communication of the work to the public, which Microsoft was able to prove. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:53 pm
In Jensen v. iShares Trust, holders of ETF shares purchased in a secondary market, i.e. not directly from the issuer, attempted to bring a Section 11 suit against the issuer. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:24 am
The FTC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
* The State's Division of Criminal Justice Services [DCJS] is required by law to maintain a registry of all full-time and part-time police officers in the State and all agencies employing police officers are required to immediately report to DCJS when any officer it has employed ceases to so serve.Executive Law §837[13] authorizes DCJS to adopt such regulations "as may be necessary or convenient to the performance of its duties. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:23 am
Koh's landmark FTC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:16 am
Braland had not previously formed a LLC, so he studied the Iowa LLC statutes and obtained a template of a farm LLC from the Iowa State Bar Association. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:38 am
Crypto Lawyers Address Tough Questions About SEC V. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
" Also, where necessary and appropriate, such disciplinary action may be conducted in absentia [see Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298]. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Chief Justice William Howard Taft in Meyers v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
United States Postal Service (Supreme Court 2019) [Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
Also, see Appeal Court of Düsseldorf stating that the different treatment of SEP licensees is accepted if it can be justified as a result of normal market behaviour, and that licensing conditions can be abusive, only if they are significantly different between licensees; see Sisvel v Haier, Appeal Court of Düsseldorf, 30 March 2017 - Case No. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 11:46 pm
Since our client resided in Youngstown, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:59 am
No one could have contemplated the current holder of the US presidency taking office. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:38 am
The Midwestern agricultural states were hit particularly hard. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
Presumably the filing of the bankruptcy petition automatically stayed the state court lawsuits. [read post]
