Search for: "State v. London"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
The organisation is called NOYB (none of your business) Surveillance The Register notes the judgment in the case of R (Privacy International) v Secretary of State [2017] EWCA Civ 1868 entitled “UK spy court ruled immune from judicial review – for now”. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm
The original two judgments can be found here : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) (Main judgment) A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020 (Original decision to anonymise) The latest judgment can be found here : PA Media Group v London Borough of Haringey & Ors [2020] EWHC 1282 (Fam) (20 May 2020) You can read Louise Tickle’s tweet thread here : Our team member… [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
Events Joining The Circle: capturing the zeitgeist of ‘Big Tech’ companies, social media speech and privacy, Inner Temple, London, Wednesday 23 May 2018. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
On Monday 29 and Tuesday 30 June 2020, the UK Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R (Z & Anor)(AP) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
It will take place on Friday 25 November in London. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am
Under Kerry v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
|Launch Event: Advancing women in tech, law and policy, ChIPs comes to London on 27 April 2017|Am I covered by that UK copyright exception? [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
United States, Buck v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
The DSM Directive provides a current example of this: its provisions are so complex that in essence the “battlefield” has moved from Strasbourg and Brussels to the Member States that will need to transpose the directive.Sophie then asked the panel a recap of the 3 best and worst contributions by the CJEU.The best 3 contributions of the CJEU according to Eleonora were:The dialogue between the CJEU and the national courts, which at times has been unavoidable (eg where the language… [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am
Rachael Hanna recapped last week’s proceedings in the United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
Pluripotent v totipotent So what does this distinction amount to? [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:08 am
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 10:16 pm
City of New London, Connecticut. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 7:22 pm
Victim states assume responsibility for their own conduct that aggravates harm caused illegally by another state. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 11:12 am
These stated variously a. [read post]
