Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
Cape Industries plc., and on an observation by Lord Keith in the House of Lords decision in Woolfson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
On Wednesday, the UK Supreme Court handed down its decision in Al-Rawi v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
It is true, as Lord Phillips observed in the House of Lords’ judgment in the present case, that one of the reasons for the prohibition is that States must stand firm against torture by excluding the evidence it produces. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Certainly this reasoning is supported by the authorities cited by Floyd J at [85]-[89], to the effect that even though an invention is obvious to try, it is nonetheless obvious only if it is “more-or-less self-evident that what is being tested ought to work” (Lord Justice Jacob in St Gobain v Fusion Provida [2005] EWCA Civ 177 [35]) and there must be a “fair expectation of success” (Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Lord & Taylor, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:37 am
Website operators in the US, who allow others to post defamatory content on their websites, can take huge comfort from a very recent decision by the New York State Court of Appeals, Shiamili v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am
These principles (as approved and slightly amended by Blindley Heath Investments Ltd & Anor v Bass [2015] EWCA Civ 1023 (“Blindley Heath”)) were referred to in Lord Burrows’ Supreme Court judgment: It is not enough that the common assumption is merely understood by the parties in the same way. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
Lord Judge was supportive of Lord Justice Leveson and of the Press Complaints Commission, both targets of criticism in the context of the inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press and the Leveson inquiry. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
Last Week in the Courts On Tuesday 13 November 2018 there was a hearing in the Privy Council (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lords Briggs and Kitchin) of an Isle of Man libel appeal, Nugent v Willers. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
Citing the House of Lords decision, Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd (2009), the Court recognised that to adopt a corrective construction: “it should be clear that something has gone wrong with the language and it should be clear what a reasonable person would have understood the parties to have meant”. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 10:49 am
The state had a reasonable explanation for the lack of Wiccan religious services. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:42 pm
Lord Neuberger, Master of the Rolls: “Since 2000, no. [read post]
Case Law: Hayes v Willoughby, Injunction granted in leading harassment action breached – Samuel Rowe
3 Apr 2019, 4:31 pm
Lord Sumption, with whom Lords Neuberger and Wilson agreed, did not accept that that a distinction could be drawn between the purpose of a course of conduct and the purpose of the person engaging in it. [read post]
