Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
The case is entitled Turner v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:46 am
Washburn student intern (now Salina PD) Andrew Parmenter and I won in State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Nellcor Puritan Bennett LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:14 am
It makes two main points: (1) Google, Facebook and other UGC services publish third party content, so of course they are co [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:36 am
Dental, the main question was whether the Board was “actively supervised” by the state. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am
Georgia, 219 Ga. 345, 133 S.E. 2d 367 (Ga. 1963); State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 8:50 am
Fourth, as mentioned above, there are significant differences in the limitations of liability under the CLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 7:14 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the main opinion in Carey v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
Maine As detailed here, in State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 7:45 am
In Perry v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:19 am
The main offences can be found stated in sections 5 and 6 of the PCA, which prohibit: individuals corruptly soliciting or receiving bribes (section 5(a)); individuals corruptly giving or offering bribes (section 5(b)); agents corruptly accepting or obtaining bribes in relation to their principals’ business (section 6(a)); and individuals corruptly giving or offering bribes to agents in relation to their principals’ business (section 6(b)). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:00 pm
Maine and Pennsylvania added work-sharing laws. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:45 am
Bryan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
As the recent case of Pinero v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
The two main companies were Pirani Enterprises and Piramco Investments Ltd. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
The case of Patmainiece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was reported in an earlier post. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:13 am
It is part of the patent ‘bargain’ between an inventor and the state – proprietors are given a 20-year monopoly in return for full disclosure of the invention. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 12:52 am
And so, this week Arnold LJ handed down his judgment in FibroGen v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 3:37 pm
The first use of the phrase was Canal Auth. of State of Fla. v. [read post]
