Search for: "State v. Mart"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 6:56 pm
Beth Burch (Florida State) has posted on SSRN her introduction to the Dukes v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:35 pm
Davis v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:50 am
In addition, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg reports on an amicus brief recently filed by nineteen major corporations in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:58 am
Wal-Mart, 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010), which the largest companies in America have asked the Supreme Court to reverse — these claims are tough to win, even tougher to make a living doing, moreso since Ashcroft v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:02 pm
The industry attorneys argued in the stay filings that, since the Court appears likely to hear the Wal-Mart appeal, raising due process issues about federal class-action cases (Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:03 am
The court began by applying the "presumption against preemption" recently resurrected in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 3:30 am
”); Trail v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:31 am
I’m sure you’ve heard about the Dukes v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:32 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil RightsChallenge to State's System of Nominating Judges Lacks Merit After 'Lopez Torres'Dibbs v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Wal-Mart, “the largest class action in history. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Dukes v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:03 am
At Law.com, Tony Mauro and Carrie Levine report that the video game industry has been soliciting the support of state attorneys general in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
This was after Eugene V. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:25 am
Chicago and Cooper Industries v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:48 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., yesterday asked the Supreme Court of the United States to review the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in Dukes v. [read post]
