Search for: "State v. Register" Results 1741 - 1760 of 13,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2022, 4:29 am by jonathanturley
However, Article V, Section 4A of the Delaware Constitution is explicit on those categories. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by V.Venkatesan
The constitutionality of DSPE Act has been already upheld by the Supreme Court in Advance Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 4:48 am by Kalvis Golde
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit because the agency published the action in the same Federal Register notice as actions affecting other states or regions and claimed to use a consistent analysis for all states. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
488/10 Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional SA v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos SL, all the way from sunny Spain, from the unforgettably-named Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 1 de Alicante y n° 1 de Marca Comunitaria [Merpel has Spanish friends with very long names; she suspects that this is just the court's pet name and that its real name is about three times longer]. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm by Jay McDaniel
In Holding Company of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 9:47 am by admin
Jamison entered the securities industry in 2010 when he became registered as a General Securities Representative through association with Valic Financial Advisors, Inc. in Atlanta, Georgia in August 6, 2010, FINRA states. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
On June 13, 2012, the California Supreme Court unanimously denied review in the case of California Society of Anesthesiologists v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
"This is another case about Google AdWords and registered trade marks". [read post]