Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc., RM Enterprises International, Inc., Steven Y. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
Yet the case--which produced a non-ideological split (Thomas for the majority, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, and Breyer, versus Scalia dissenting, joined by Souter and Ginsburg)--was only indirectly connected to net neutrality. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
In Benisek v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:55 am
In Biden v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
’” All these opinions rely heavily on McCreary County v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
L.Rev. 775 (May 2010) Steven S. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
L.Rev. 775 (May 2010) Steven S. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:59 am
Roberts, Jr., Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Antonin Scalia. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:21 am
Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
Later, Justice Kagan joked that it seems like nobody "can use dirty words except for Steven Spielberg. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:09 am
He wrote the most on-point opinion, Garcetti v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Jury - http://bit.ly/SParA8 (Dan Levine) Apple v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:42 am
EPA, Boumediene, Wyeth, and Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
Indeed, a far better predictor of a justice’s vote is the justice’s ideology, rather than whether a justice uses a methodology like originalism or not to decide a case (think of Scalia and Justice John Paul Stevens in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
As Akhil Amar has observed, "[v]irtually no serious modern scholar - left, right, and center - thinks that [Slaughterhouse] is a plausible reading of the Amendment. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:04 am
Adopted in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:26 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion, which Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer joined. [read post]
