Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 7,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2022, 5:54 pm
… by the United States House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol …. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
[P]laintiff must point to a statute or judicial decision that clearly states such a strong public policy. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Currently, in the United States around 2,500 police departments have K-9 units and up to 75% of these units train their dogs to bite and hold. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
For the Supreme Court of the United States, this will be remembered as the year of intellectual dishonesty. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
For the Supreme Court of the United States, this will be remembered as the year of intellectual dishonesty. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Plessy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
First, it only applies to “any person within the United States,” so spoofed calls initiated outside the United States are not covered. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:07 am
AnimalFeeds International Corp., the United States Supreme Court stated that class arbitration “changes the nature of arbitration,” an idea that was also reflected in the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
McCulloch v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:40 pm
" In a 1993 decision, Herrera v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am
The court justifies its “plain language” approach “[b]ecause this case presents an issue of first impression in Wisconsin and there is no guidance from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
A Federal court in California has struck down a ban on gay marriage in the state, marking the first step on a path to a United States Supreme Court decision on the issue. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:19 am
There are certainly strong indications that this is what InterDigital is trying to do. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:44 am
The case, RILR v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:18 pm
Moreover, Canada is asking a lot of the United States, too; having this month filed a broad-ranging World Trade Organization (WTO) complaint [PDF] against the United States alleging that the latter is flouting WTO rules in the way that it imposes tariffs and duties on other countries. [read post]
