Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 8,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:37 am
United States 16-5454 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:45 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:58 am
Twist ties are imported into the United States under Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheadings 8309.90.0000 and 5609.00.3000. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:52 am
The New York Court of Appeals unanimously held that the Legislature could permissibly regulate the Fund in this manner under the Contracts Clause, the Takings Clause, and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:11 pm
; Any state and federal tax returns filed by you in the United States for the years of 2020 and 2021; Any filings or submissions provided, or representations made, to any authority of the United Kingdom or any political entity therein with responsibility for taxation of income or assets. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:32 am
United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Respondent also stated during the interview that, under Directive 4511R-B, he did not need petitioner’s authorization to purchase handguns that were authorized by the military (Pet. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Respondent also stated during the interview that, under Directive 4511R-B, he did not need petitioner’s authorization to purchase handguns that were authorized by the military (Pet. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
The court had previously interpreted nearly identical language in the Federal Railroad Safety Act as requiring evidence of retaliatory intent, another reason to interpret SOX consistently with that holding.In his petition for certiorari, the whistleblower points to the burdens of proof incorporated by reference in the SOX provision (“An action brought under paragraph (1)(B) shall be governed by the legal burdens of proof set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United… [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:35 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 4:07 pm
They then relocated to the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
The Docker fee has the effect of preventing poor and destitute American Citizens from access the State and U.S. district Courts, and the United States Supreme Court.( 42 ESC: 1981 Access to the Courts).On 1215 The British's Magna Carter granted to poor English's citizens their Common Law's Rights to access to the Royal Court without paying for their rights under the Magna Carter of 1215. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:25 pm
By law, if you married your petitioner-fiancé within 90 days of your K-1 visa entry, you are eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) in the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:21 pm
By law, if you married your petitioner-fiancé within 90 days of your K-1 visa entry, you are eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) in the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 10:52 pm
By law, if you married your petitioner-fiancé within 90 days of your K-1 visa entry, you are eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 11:38 pm
By law, if you married your petitioner-fiancé within 90 days of your K-1 visa entry, you are eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) in the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:27 pm
By law, if you married your petitioner-fiancé within 90 days of your K-1 visa entry, you are eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:33 pm
By law, if you married your petitioner-fiancé within 90 days of your K-1 visa entry, you are eligible to apply for adjustment of status (green card) in the United States. [read post]
