Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 9,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its opinion in Moore v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:52 am
There are a lot of crazies coming out of the woodwork with respect to the ACLU’s efforts to have the patent laws of the United States declared unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Over the course of a long career as a civil rights and criminal defense lawyer, I have spent a great deal of time in a great many state, federal, and military prisons in the United States and her colonial outposts in Guantanamo and Iraq. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:52 am
Florida v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:30 pm
Khan v. the United Kingdom and Onur v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Perez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:23 pm
So far, lower courts have disagreed with him, most recently in State v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:00 am
Looks like the tenant won this one by miles.For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Condor Funding, LLC v Miles--------------------------*Real Property Law section 226-b provides that a tenant (in a building with four or more residential units) may seek a landlord's permission to sublease an apartment (notwithstanding any prohibition or restriction that may appear in the parties' lease agreement). [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:30 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 10:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 3:39 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:39 am
Gill et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:16 am
United Fabricare Supply, Inc. v. 3Hanger Supply Company, Inc., 2012 WL 2449916 (C.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
The University of Michigan moves to dismiss this claim, arguing that, as a Michigan state department, it is entitled to immunity from suit under the 11th Amendment.The 11th Amendment provides, in relevant part: `The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State[.] [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
Significantly for our purposes, the same is true of the distinction between entailment and implicature. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:01 am
Ct. 2382, 2386 (1991); see also United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:34 pm
The purpose of that concurring opinion is to express disagreement with the Ninth Circuit’s “mistaken belief”—stated most recently in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
And these folks will not be from just the United States, they’ll be from all over the world. [read post]
