Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 1741 - 1760 of 7,222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2019, 3:17 am
SteckelReflection: Trademark Office: Year-End Wrap-Up, by Mary Boney DenisonMary Boney Denison, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Commissioner for Trademarks, looks back on her tenure—which ends in 2019—and provides readers with valuable insights from inside the USPTO.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Once again, I thank The Trademark Reporter for allowing me to make this issue… [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:39 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
Move Press had registered this trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and its use of the mark clearly preceded the use by Peloton. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
NantKwest that the Patent and Trademark Office cannot recover the salaries of its legal personnel in a district-court proceeding contesting the denial of a patent. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:00 pm
Post By Tina G Yin-Sowatzke The United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled on December 11, 2019, that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) cannot demand repayment of attorney’s fees in district court proceedings brought under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
The question presented in this case is whether such “expenses” include the salaries of attorney and paralegal employees of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Jody Coultas
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision to dismiss an attorney’s challenge of his bar license suspension as the attorney’s procedural and substantive challenges to the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s disciplinary proceeding were rejected (Piccone v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
Merchandise which is introduced or attempted to be introduced into the United States contrary to law shall be treated as follows: (2)The merchandise may be seized and forfeited if— … (C) it is merchandise or packaging in which copyright, design patent, trademark, or trade name protection violations are involved (including, but not limited to, violations of section 1124, 1125, or 1127 of title 15, section 506 of title… [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:47 am by Jo Dale Carothers
When sued for patent infringement, a defendant can still petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the asserted patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) if the petition is filed within one year of service of the complaint. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:47 am by Jo Dale Carothers
When sued for patent infringement, a defendant can still petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the asserted patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) if the petition is filed within one year of service of the complaint. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by Gene Quinn
On November 13, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requested the U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by Gene Quinn
On November 13, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requested the U.S. [read post]
Even before state-level legalization of cannabis, pot patents have been quietly issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) since at least 2000. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:15 am by Robert Friedman
The AIA brought with it the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Inter Partes Review (IPRs), a post-grant adversarial proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
It would seem a straightforward case with the outcome largely dictated by the Court’s own earlier decisions on state immunity in the patent and trademark context. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
As recently as a decade ago,[i] China’s patent office, SIPO, which serves a country with three times the population of the United States, processed less than half as many patent applications as the USPTO, America’s patent and trademark… McElroy Law BlogTech and Privacy: Protecting Against Unreasonable Search and Seizure In 2017, I spoke at a conference put on by SERENE-RISC, an organization that works on issues of cybersecurity… [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:15 am by Robert Levy
Ct. 2347 (2014), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased its focus on patent eligibility. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:15 am by Robert Levy
Ct. 2347 (2014), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased its focus on patent eligibility. [read post]
The EEA classified trade secrets as a fourth type of intellectual property after copyrights, trademarks, and patents and extended federal criminal protection to trade secrets. [read post]