Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 1741 - 1760 of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm by John Stigi and Melissa Mikail
June 27, 2024), the United Stated Supreme Court (Roberts, C.J.) held that when the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment of the United States Constitution entitles the defendant to a trial by jury. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am by Susan Haines
(“Quickway”), through its affiliates, has terminals with trucking operations throughout the United States, including a terminal in Louisville, Kentucky that only provided services for a national grocery chain. [read post]
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a  motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am by SHG
On June 26, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
  States with similar laws (like Alabama) will certainly be watching closely. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am by Wells C. Bennett
Judge Walton, Sullivan says, also never found that the petitioner raised a finger against the United States or its allies. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:13 am by Jack Goldsmith
And last week I explained how the logic of the Executive branch’s constitutional arguments in the Bergdahl context might extend to transferring the GTMO detainees to the United States as part of closing GTMO. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:00 am by Eliot Kim
United States for being unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am by Jeremy Malcolm
For one thing, it's not just the United States pushing this agenda; Europe is doing so also. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:39 pm by Scott McKeown
The United States, through the Director, does “exercise . . . political responsibility” over the decision to proceed with IPR. [read post]