Search for: "WEEKS v. WILLIAMS"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 4,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 6:57 am
Nama Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am
Finally, in an essay for the Stanford Law Review Online, Jason Zarrow and William Milliken contend that the Court “clearly has jurisdiction in Montgomery. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:28 pm
Taft V of Debevoise & Plimpton. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
In today’s case (Zhibawi v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
John Elwood reviews this week’s relisted cases. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:30 am
WILLIAMS, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:10 am
” Corwin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:13 pm
On Tuesday afternoon local time, Judge William H. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
At ACSblog, Victor Williams criticizes Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion in NLRB v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
" Via the Faculty Lounge, we hear that "C-SPAN begins a twelve-part television series on landmark Supreme Court decisions next week, kicking off with Marbury v. [read post]
The BASMATI saga: General Court accommodates extended passing off within Community trade mark system
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
Earlier this week Katfriend Nigel Urwin (Lee Bolton Monier-Williams) brought to the IPKat's attention news of a case (Tilda Riceland Private v OHMI - Siam Grains (BASMALI), T-136/14) that the General Court (GC) decided on 30 September last, and appears to have some relevant implications particularly as far as that peculiar creature of UK common law known as extended passing off is concerned.Before going into the details of the decision, what is extended passing… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 2:18 pm
In today’s case (Williams v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Earlier this week, in the Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:25 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:25 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
A couple of weeks ago our dear blogmeister Jeremy addressed the British Group of the Union of European Practitioners in Intellectual Property in the convivial setting of The Royal Overseas League on this topic. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Whiting, and three weeks ago federal District Court Judge Susan Bolton issued a ruling on both. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 5:15 am
And that was the week that was. [read post]
