Search for: "Wells v. Unknown" Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2007, 11:06 am
Kuster explained one "issue with nanoparticles is the unknown toxicology especially of the non-biodegradable ones. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  In Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown [2015] EWHC 2628 (QB) (see our blog here) Warby J noted that whether financial loss is “serious” must depend upon the context. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Then, on 17 September 2019, and for no other reason than to capitalise on his sudden popularity, The Sun published news of an unknown, historic family tragedy with headline ‘Exclusive: Tragedy That Haunts Stokes’ Family: Hero Ben’s brother and sister were shot dead,’ screaming from its front page. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:06 am by Melanie O'Brien
The ICJ CERD Cases Two cases brought under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), Armenia v Azerbaijan and Azerbaijan v Armenia, are relevant, both of which center on Nagorno-Karabakh. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Saraphin Dhanani
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down an opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Officials simultaneously seized evidence from the Markell’s home as well as their business, Silk Roads Design Gallery.The museum raids generated three published criminal cases:United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 1:09 pm
Twombly (05-1126), that is almost certainly completely unknown  outside of the legal community. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Their views appear to greatly differ from those of Bebchuk's, who proposes allowing shareholders to alter "rules-of-the-game" decisions or else elect a new team of directors who will.[3] This report will use Bainbridge, Blair and Stout's theories in support of an amendment seeking to expand the rule's exclusions regarding shareholder proposals to limit shareholders' input dealing with elections in general, while Bebchuk's theories will be relied upon to… [read post]