Search for: "YOUNGS v. CASE" Results 1741 - 1760 of 9,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 4:50 pm by Jessica Mendelson
On February 27, 2012, a California federal judge for the Northern District of California, decided the case of Hegwer v. [read post]
It has previously been accepted that benefits are within the ambit of art 1 of Protocol 1 (the right to property/peaceful enjoyment of possessions) but not that they fall within art 8, which this judgment now resolves (at least on the facts of these cases, but with a likely wider application in comparable cases). [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 2:15 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
This is one of several cases before the Supreme Court this term raising issues of privacy and the retention of information by the police (see also R (Catt) and R (T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, and Gaughran v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland), and it will be interesting to see how the Court approaches art 8 in a variety of policing contexts. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 7:29 pm
I previously posted about the case of Miken v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:28 am by Amy Howe
Today the justices granted review in the case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Next week, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:00 am by Charles Sartain
According to the court, Jedlicka was the first time the issue of paying quantities has been addressed since the 1899 case of Young v. [read post]