Search for: "A. Jackson" Results 1761 - 1780 of 27,904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:42 am by Howard Friedman
Consideration of other options, such as voluntary shift swapping, would also be necessary.Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Jackson, filed a concurring opinion, saying in part:Petitioner Gerald Groff asks this Court to overrule Hardison.... [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am by Eugene Volokh
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Jackson, joined the Court's opinion but added, among other things: Petitioner Gerald Groff asks this Court to overrule Hardison and to replace it with a "significant difficulty or expense" standard. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:47 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Supreme Court’s ruling on online harassment outrages victims, advocates (Taylor Lorenz, The Washington Post) For Ketanji Brown Jackson, a self-assured and forceful US Supreme Court debut (Andrew Chung & John Kruzel, Reuters) Here’s what a new Supreme Court case could mean for federal wealth tax proposals (Kate Dore, CNBC) The Supreme Court Wrestles the Rights Monster (Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal)  Neil… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Jackson Women’s Health Organization and litigation in its wake as the jumping off point to reconsider the connections between judges, the Constitution, and social movements. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:50 am by David Lynn
Justice Jackson also filed a concurring opinion. * * * * Mallory represents a potentially vast increase in out-of-state corporations’ exposure to jurisdiction in unexpected places, often where jury verdicts are excessive. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:27 am by Seán Binder
Chris Jackson and Annaleise Azevedo Lohr report for Ipsos. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
President & Fellows of Harvard College with Justice Jackson recused), the Supreme Court held that Harvard and UNC’s race-conscious admissions policies fail strict scrutiny and thus violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
President & Fellows of Harvard College with Justice Jackson recused), the Supreme Court held that Harvard and UNC’s race-conscious admissions policies fail strict scrutiny and thus violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
President & Fellows of Harvard College with Justice Jackson recused), the Supreme Court held that Harvard and UNC’s race-conscious admissions policies fail strict scrutiny and thus violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
President & Fellows of Harvard College with Justice Jackson recused), the Supreme Court held that Harvard and UNC’s race-conscious admissions policies fail strict scrutiny and thus violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
President & Fellows of Harvard College with Justice Jackson recused), the Supreme Court held that Harvard and UNC’s race-conscious admissions policies fail strict scrutiny and thus violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
President & Fellows of Harvard College with Justice Jackson recused), the Supreme Court held that Harvard and UNC’s race-conscious admissions policies fail strict scrutiny and thus violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:05 pm by Molly Buckley
As Justices Jackson and Sotomayor correctly note in their dissent, by “depart[ing] from ordinary principles of statutory interpretation,” the Court “avoids having to invalidate this statute under our well-established First Amendment overbreadth doctrine” and thus “subverts the speech-protective goals” of that constitutional doctrine. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Mark Ashton
Kagan wrote the majority opinion joined by Roberts, Alito, Kavanaugh and Jackson. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Uzan, 388 F.3d 39 (2d Cir. 2004), the Second Circuit held the trial court has discretion whether to stay all proceedings in this context.In dissent, Justice Jackson says this mandatory-general-stay rule in arbitration cases "comes out of nowhere, as the FAA does not authorize it, and that the better option is for the trial judge to exercise her discretion in deciding whether to stay all proceedings while the arbitration appeal is pending. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs Jackson Land and Cattle, LLC, JLC Ranch Development, LLC, and JLC Ranch, LLC are Delaware limited liability companies that own the Wyoming Property, which are controlled and indirectly owned by Fields (id., ¶14). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
Jackson also wrote a brief concurrence that emphasized that personal jurisdiction is a waivable right, focusing on the Court’s opinion in Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. [read post]