Search for: "Application of Texas Co." Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 3:03 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  In June 2018, an HHS Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of OCR and required The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MD Anderson), a Texas cancer center, to pay $4.3 million in civil money penalties for HIPAA violations. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(IP finance) An IP strategist’s economic forecast for 2010: an outsider’s view and how one can outperform the ‘experts’ (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)   Australia Advisory Council on Intellectual Property proposes setting up IP dispute resolution centre to deal with patent disputes (Managing Intellectual Property)   Brazil IP infringement and capacity to sue in Brazil (IP tango) WTO rules in favour of Brazil, allows for cross retaliation against… [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Fred Goldsmith
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 2010 WL 298387 (Cal. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Compliance with Court Order requiring election of claims does not bar later assertion of non-elected claims: LML Patent Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Craftsman Machinery Co., 548 A.2d 736, 744 (Conn. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 6:22 am by Juan C. Antúnez
In other words, as in Delaware, Illinois, Texas, and Virginia, a Florida directed trustee is not liable for complying with the directions of a trust protector/director unless by so doing the directed trustee would personally engaging in “willful” or “intentional” misconduct. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Texas, and who testified repeatedly on RFRA’s successors in Congress and the states, and who has written extensively on the legislative history and RFRA itself, the answer is “No. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am by Miriam Seifter
The City of Arlington, Texas, sought review in the Fifth Circuit, arguing, inter alia, that the Commission lacked authority to issue a binding interpretation of Section 332(c)(7)(B). [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Falls Media, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB Precedential No 15: TTAB affirms rejection of website specimen for goods, ordering information lacking: In re Quantum Foods, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB enters summary judgment: Applicant lacked bona fide intent to use FEAR TH [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
Regards, Eric Goldman Professor of Law and Co-Director, High Tech Law Institute Santa Clara University School of Law Lyrissa B. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
§ 112, which provides that the patent must include “claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 1:04 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Counsel, the American Bar Foundation and the Texas Bar Foundation, Ms. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Further reduced penalty caps are applicable to submissions for certain 501(c)(3) organizations and for Top Hat and Apprenticeship programs. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A careful analysis of the Fifth Circuit’s decision makes clear that its decision about each of the four challenged policies covered by T-Mobile’s appeal turned upon the Court’s careful analysis of the surrounding context under which the applicable policy was implemented and administered reflected in the factual record. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:28 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
About the Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: ERISA & Employee Benefits,” “Health… [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:27 pm by Charles Johnson
These crimes are characterized by deceit, concealment, or violation of trust, and are not dependent upon the application or threat of physical force or violence. [read post]