Search for: "Bull v. Bull"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 3,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Carpenter, Calling Bulls**t on the Lanham Act: The 2(a) Bar for Scandalous, Immoral, and Disparaging Marks Various “bullshit” marks have been refused registration, whereas BLACK TAIL, BIG PECKER’S, and BADASS all made it through. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 60 [week ending on Sunday 23 August] - Test-drive of the Unitary Patent Court, Parts V and VI |From food porn to porn with food: passion with Parmesan | USPTO Guidelines on patent eligibility | Red Bull fends off Crazy Bull in Greece | Biker Biker Biker Gang! [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
IPKat Eleonora Rosati discusses the US and Italian copyright provisions in the context of the alleged moral rights infringement due to the placement of Kristen Visbal’s sculpture known as “Fearless girl” opposite Arturo Di Modica’s sculpture entitled “Charging Bull”. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:08 am
Pegasystems, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
• The ANCHOR trial demonstrates that Vascepa® lowers triglyceride levels in patients with high (≥ 200 mg/dL and < 500 mg/dL) triglyceride levels not controlled by diet and statin therapy. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:07 am
Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm
• MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Justify v. specify: lawyers deal with specification. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:16 pm
Of particular note are: • On the burden of proof, I believe Stoney v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:04 am
by Maurizio Borghi UK: CSC Media Group Ltd v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:50 am
., Oppenheimer v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 1:05 pm
In the case of Bernstein & Grazian, P.C. v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:05 pm
Unfortunately, only three Justices voted in favor of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Petrella v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:38 am
In Apps v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:31 am
Here are a few cases to watch for over the coming weeks: Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor (9 – 10 October): The appellant hotel owners refused to let the respondent couple, who are in a civil partnership, stay in a double room in their hotel. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 1:16 am
• Máscara de converso. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
• McKay v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Last September, broadcasters and amici supporters filed their briefs in the Second Circuit in WNET v Aereo. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm
For over 50 years, under the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bivens v. [read post]
