Search for: "Bush v. United States"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Bush. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am
Brennan, Jr. of the United States Supreme Court and to the Hon. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm
Meanwhile, the "invasion" issue will be before the Fifth Circuit again in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:33 am
Although the armed forces could employ this prohibition to restrain retirees’ political speech, the government has only initiated court-martial proceedings against one retired service member—nearly one hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:33 pm
The case is Kiyemba v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
Bush. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
Bush invaded Panama in Operation Just Cause. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:09 am
Here’s another one: A WTO case brought in 2007 against China’s lax intellectual property laws was won by the United States two years later. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 8:20 am
” In his second column (Winter 2001), shortly after Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
Thanks to good ole' President Bush for eradicating everyones right to a fair trial. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:55 am
— United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court has offered snippets of its view on this in some cases, stating in Fleming v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
The Florida Supreme Court decided that this arbitrary and capricious constraint is unconstitutional under both the Florida and United States Constitutions. [read post]
