Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 1761 - 1780 of 11,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2019, 12:16 pm by Matthew Borges
The European Court of Human Rights on Tuesday rejected Italy’s request for referral in Marcello Viola v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
    As the Appellate Division, Third Department, held in People v Wilhelm (34 AD3d 40 [3d Dept 2006]):    we are satisfied that the CPS caseworkers involved here had a "cooperative working arrangement" with and were acting as agents of the police and prosecutor in interviewing defendant and relaying her incriminating statements (People v Greene, 306 AD2d 639, 641). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:02 pm by admin
Circuit Court of Appeals case on this issue, Garcia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 2:31 pm by Guest Author
The leading case is the 3rd Circuit’s 1993 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:35 pm by Beard Stacey & Jacobsen, LLP
A crab fisherman reportedly injured his abdomen while pulling in crab pots on the F/V IRENE H on January 13, 2015. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am by Bruce Zagaris and Zarine Kharazian
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am by Bruce Zagaris and Zarine Kharazian
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 10:46 am
Conversely, Justice Cooper concludes that such a rule would give trial judges way too much leeway in setting fee awards and potentially unjustly punish prevailing parties.Justice Rubin and Justice Cooper both make very good arguments. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:57 am
  Applying the test established in Critical Mass Energy Project v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
To list just some of the landmark opinions the Court issued during those seven years is to prove the point: Cooper v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:43 am by John Jascob
The staff will say that it considered a company’s cooperation, then impose a large penalty anyway. [read post]