Search for: "Commonwealth v. Person, S." Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 10:40 am by Richard Mumford
(paragraph 84) In dealing with the Claimant’s Article 6 point, Stadlen J conducts an equally thorough review of the authorities, including most recently R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14, Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Trust [2010] ICR 101, and R (G) v X School Governors [2010] 1 WLR 2218. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:01 am by Susan Brenner
The fact Rollman lacked a personal computer from which she could access MySpace does not lessen the threatening nature of [Holcomb’s] posts because Rollman could, and did, just as easily access MySpace from her mother's computer. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:14 pm by Gideon
In 2002, in the landmark decision Atkins v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:06 am by Michael DelSignore
A Massachusetts Fourth Offense OUI conviction was upheld by the Appeals Court in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:59 pm
As a Dedham/Boston Massachusetts OUI defense lawyer, this ruling strikes me as considerably inconsistent with the court’s fairly recent, and landmark, ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]