Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 1761 - 1780 of 16,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Giorgio Buono
The proposed measures, which could be adopted on the basis of Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, include: (i) enhancing cooperation and communication among authorities of EU Member States in this area; (ii) abolishing the requirement of exequatur for measures of protection taken in EU Member States; (iii) creating a European certificate of powers granted for the protection of an adult; (iv) enabling the adult, under appropriate safeguards, to choose… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:15 pm by EEM
International Refugee Assistance Project and Trump v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Yesterday, the Tenth Circuit voted 5–4 not to rehear the Utah roadside cross memorial case, American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 10:21 am by Kent Scheidegger
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote in the court's majority opinion that states can "outlaw cross burnings done with the intent to intimidate. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
"10/26/09 NY Times:Andrew Koppelman, a law professor at Northwestern and the author of "Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines," said [plaintiffs' attorney Theodore] Olson will have trouble attracting votes from the current justices. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:46 am
A New Jersey Appellate Division Court has recently ruled, in the case of State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm by WIMS
Intervenors are also, however, cross-claimants in the State Court Action, who were allowed to intervene in this case to prevent the extinguishment of rights of contribution they seek to enforce against Sherwin-Williams for contamination of their properties at Site B. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The rule in Bonnard v Perryman was subsequently followed by the Court of Appeal in Greene v Associated Newspapers ([2005] QB 972) which determined that it was based upon (1) the importance of freedom of speech; (2) the constitutional importance of a jury in defamation cases; (3) that until there has been disclosure of documents and cross-examination at trial, the court cannot usually properly assess whether what is to be said is true or not; and (4) that damages,… [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 4:55 am by Victoria VanBuren
We are happy to share our featured articles for 2012: Class and Collective Relief in the Cross-Border Context:  A Possible Role for the Permanent Court of Arbitration Ten Hallmarks of Effective Arbitration Agreements with Sovereigns and State Entities The New 2012 ICC Arbitration Rules International Arbitration and the Republic of Colombia:  Commercial, Comparative and Constitutional Concerns From a U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:32 am
If the President, for example, placed a permanent cross in the White House without using funds earmarked by Congress, it is unlikely anyone would have standing to challenge that decision Hein also reaffirms the seminal taxpayer standing case, Flast v. [read post]