Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
§ 78u-5(c). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
In response, InfoUSA reiterates its position that step (D) was a common-sense addition to steps (A)-(C), citing its experts' opinions. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:09 am
Tung V. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
P. 9.430(d). 5 Fla. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
” Shield Mark BV v Joost Kist, Case C-283/01 [2004] ECR I-14313. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:19 pm
Neither this section nor any other section of this Act preempts or otherwise displaces claims and remedies available under State law, except as otherwise specifically provided in this Act. [read post]
Supreme Court Declines to Enshrine the Independence of the Bar as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
13 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
Malmo-Levine; R. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
As the judge explains in this opinion, Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides as follows: `A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert's scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:17 am
(d) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(2) that the conduct consisted of medical care for the child and did not include any contact between the anus or sexual organ of the child and the mouth, anus, or sexual organ of the actor or a third party. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
-Corpus Christi 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.) [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:14 am
For example, in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 5:22 am
There is no balancing in the sense of a passage that would say procompetitive benefits X and Y outweigh the anticompetitive effects A, B, and C. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:21 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 7:30 am
The CAA adds a new subsection (B) to Section 365(d)(3), limited to Subchapter V cases, which permits the bankruptcy court to further extend the 60-day period for an additional 60 days if the Subchapter V debtor “is experiencing or has experienced a material financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
C. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
Facebook, 2017 WL 3084476 (D. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Walker (D. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:59 pm
An unprecedented cost award on a summary judgment motion recently in Hughes v. [read post]
