Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 2:09 am
State of U.P (2004)(upholding the ban on the sale of eggs in Rishikesh in addition to the alreadyexisting ban on the sale of meat and fish) and Hinsa VirodhakSangh v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Becerra and Becerra v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 8:38 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 8:00 am
R. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
The guidance further examines the relevance of the so called Pannu test (Pannu v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 3:28 am
Instagram, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:36 pm
Bergeson, James V. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm
While the Australian proposal is not the same as SOPA (the blocks would have to be approved by a court, for example), it would share many of the same dangers, such as the rubbery definition of sites "the dominant purpose of which is to infringe copyright. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:14 am
The year after the dispute started, the Ninth Circuit's reversal of the district court's FTC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 12:00 am
Recent cases (Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook) have demonstrated the perils of worldwide content takedown orders. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
On 1 February 2023, the General Court of the EU issued two judgments (T-568/21 and T-569/21 – Zoubier Harbaoui v EUIPO) on two trade mark oppositions filed by Google with the EUIPO against the trade mark applications for the signs "GOOGLE CAR" and "GC GOOGLE CAR". [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
” And writing at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf suggests that Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:50 am
In recent weeks, the news here in Columbia, South Carolina has been dominated by a particularly horrific multiple murder-rape-arson case. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court’s notorious decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:33 pm
(Valiyee v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
Preemption may be found where the scheme of federal regulation is sufficiently comprehensive to make reasonable the inference that Congress left no room for supplementary state regulation, or where the federal interest is so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject.Federal preemption may also be found where Federal law conflicts with State law. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 6:52 pm
V. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
In the recent UK Supreme Court decision O (a minor), R (on the application of v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 3, Lord Hodge provided a pithy statement of the approach of the courts in that jurisdiction. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:22 pm
State (1939)), and the right to leaflet extends even to nonpublic forum government property such as airports (see ISKCON v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:17 am
Though most of them assuredly abhorred the decision, it dovetailed neatly with the dominant theorization of the relations between courts and movements. [read post]
