Search for: "Daniels v. State" Results 1761 - 1780 of 4,974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2023, 3:28 am by jonathanturley
While the trial judge found that Daniels’ drug use placed him outside of the protection of the Second Amendment, the Fifth Circuit relied upon the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:40 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
The Sixth Circuit made clear that Lagosabrogated the holding of United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:18 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his April 8 decision in the case of Bingham v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
Constitution, including most notably the Equal Protection Clause.As noted in Bush v Gore, a state’s determination shall be “conclusive” only if made pursuant to a law “made prior to election day” by which the “state legislature has provided for final determination of contests or controversies . . . . [read post]
1 May 2025, 9:03 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:13 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
” Auer deference—which came from the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Auer v. [read post]
23 May 2025, 8:29 am by Holly
May 22, 2025 |  By: Anna Kinney and Daniel Finnegan   Congratulations on being awarded a patent in the United States! [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am by Sophie Corke
The Hague Patents Court conducts first virtual hearing in patent case | [Guestpost] Australian government fails to recoup clopidogrel costs from Sanofi | The Bad Spaniel Gets a Treat: VIP Products LLC v Jack Daniels Properties Inc | Does the duration of the storage matter? [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 10:55 am by Daniel Cappetta
In its decision, the SJC stated “that the same due process principles that underlie our decision in [Commonwealth v. [read post]