Search for: "Day v. United States"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 25,636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2018, 5:13 pm
The panel (Circuit Judges Srinivasan, Millett & Sentelle) concluded that the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction under the terms of the applicable treaty between the United States and Colombia, although none of the defendants had been aboard the ill-fated boat. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:32 pm
As our readers will know, beginning in January of 2020, to protect against the rise of COVID-19 infections in the United States, the President issued a series of Presidential Proclamations that suspended and restricted entry into the United States, of immigrants and nonimmigrants, who were physically present within the Schengen Area, Brazil, China, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Iran, during the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:34 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:06 am
Ford Motor Company, November 29, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the the Sixth Circuit More Blog Entries: J&J Fires Back on Pelvic Mesh Marketing Lawsuit, July 15, 2016, Boston Product Liability Attorney Blog The post Jackson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:49 am
United States. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:53 am
On this day in history, the Supreme Court ruled, in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 12:11 pm
Only days before the landmark decision in the Jacksonville Juvenile case of Graham v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm
Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Today is the 26th anniversary of United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
Workers United Canada Council v Winners Merchants International, 2015 CanLII 21612 (ON LA) [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
In Lopez v Villareal, 2012 WL 458490 (D.Nev.)) [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
For example, if an LPR was “absent from the United States for a continuous period in excess of 180 days” (ii) or “engaged in illegal activity after having departed the United States” (iii), upon her return, she would have to seek admission. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 5:08 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
The order was served electronically the same day. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
First up is United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
Question No. 5 Real Case: YES Citation: United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v . [read post]
