Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
Sidamon-Eristoff, Nos. 10-4551, 10-4552, 10-4553, 10-4714, 10-4715, 10-4716, 11-1141, 11-1164 & 11-1170 (3d Cir. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
Patent Nos. 6,115,074 (the “‘074 patentâ€) and 5,329,369 (the ‘‘369 patentâ€). [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
In re: Miller, Docket Nos. 104022, 104035 cons. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:50 pm
The following are 5 no-nos for a residential landlord. 1. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:33 am
Patent Nos. 5,753,441 (claims 7 & 8); 5,747,282 (claims 16 & 17); and 5,837,492 (claims 29 & 30). [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:34 pm
Allergan owns several patents relating to its COMBIGAN combination ophthalmic drug treatment: Patent Nos. 7,323,463, 7,642,258, 7,320,976, and 7,030,149. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:26 pm
Our next entry will focus on the who, what, how, when, and where of the BDC filing. [1] FCC Establishes New Digital Opportunity Data Collection, WC Docket Nos. 19-195, 11-10, Press Release (rel. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
A SPECIFICATION IS CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFICIENT IF IT DOES NOT ALLEGE ALL OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE CHARGED OFFENSE AND FAIRLY INFORM THE ACCUSED OF WHICH HE MUST DEFEND. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
Logitech has now replied by seeking reexamination of those patents (see inter partes Request Nos. (7), (8) & (9)). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
If the registrant does determine its cyber security risk or previous cyber incidents rise to the level of a disclosable event, the SEC guidance notes that such disclosure might contain information reflecting: Discussion of aspects of the registrant’s business or operations that give rise to material cybersecurity risks and the potential costs and consequences; To the extent the registrant outsources functions that have material cybersecurity risks, description of those… [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
Logitech has now replied by seeking reexamination of those patents (see inter partes Request Nos. (7), (8) & (9)). [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
(“Mylan”), a generic drug manufacturer, was subject to specific personal jurisdiction in Delaware because Mylan had filed an abbreviated new drug application (“ANDA”) and “contemplate[d] plans to engage in marketing of the proposed generic drugs” in the state.[2] The ruling affirmed two different decisions by judges in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware that Mylan was subject to specific jurisdiction in Delaware.[3] However,… [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
I believe the “benefit of the employer” rule does not apply to this case. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
One reason is the limited degree of uniformity created by the New York Convention which does not entirely eliminate differences between the national jurisdictions (especially in the context of arbitrability and public policy).11 The perspective of European law is different. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
Lo cual, razonaba, no nos impide leerla de otro modo: debía ser interpretada como una amnistía autorizada por la Constitución. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:38 am
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights generally, or the relevant Principles (Nos. 7 and 23 more specifically) in its decision making. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:39 am
., Case Nos. 13-16106 & 13-16107 (D.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:30 am
NOTEWORTHY EXCERPT: Our law does not, however, allow us to abandon a balance of harms analysis just because a potential environmental injury is at issue. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
[ii] Nos. 20-2359, 20-2360, 2021 U.S. [read post]
