Search for: "Doe v. Delaware"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 3,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2008, 7:41 pm
New England Surfaces v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 6:30 pm
Grace Brothers, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:37 pm
The answer is yes, at least under Delaware law, as held by the Delaware Court of Chancery last week in R & R Capital, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
The Report does argue that shareholders have adequate means to influence management. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 12:11 pm
On remand, and applying Delaware law, the Circuit Court for Montgomery County looked to pre-formation extrinsic evidence to determine whether there was any agreement on what would happen in the event of a bilateral objection. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
Laureate Education, Inc. does not apply. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:14 am
Citing, among other cases, the recent Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Nemec v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
The Court noted that a Delaware Supreme Court decision, Rossdeutscher v. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 1:52 pm
Citing Delaware v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 4:10 pm
” Pileggi’s post does an admirable job explaining the implications of the decision. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:11 pm
Robocast, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
Chancery Decides: Not Per Se Breach of Fiduciary Duty for a Board to Fail to have a Succession Plan.
1 Jul 2012, 5:50 pm
’” Use of Special Litigation Committee does not, Ipso Facto, Excuse Demand The Court distinguished the Sutherland v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
[1] See NACEPF v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
Aveta Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 7:32 am
However, it has real world consequences as is made clear in the case of County of Saratoga v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:19 pm
Grunstein v. [read post]
