Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 152,642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
”[1] In one 2020 paper, the FTC’s staff examined a large potash merger and concluded that the “evidence does not indicate that the firms were able to impose an anticompetitive price increase in the wake of the merger. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:55 am
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
" As Alito notes, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:34 am
But not this case.The post What Does <i>Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
In Sparf v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:43 am
From an originalist perspective, NLRB v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:25 am
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
Of course, that Trump wants to enact all these horrific policies does not mean he will succeed. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Given the absence of a provision for prior approval — a finding that petitioner does not dispute — the Comptroller appropriately found that the agreements do not cover when or how petitioner worked overtime. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Given the absence of a provision for prior approval — a finding that petitioner does not dispute — the Comptroller appropriately found that the agreements do not cover when or how petitioner worked overtime. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:33 am
In Murthy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Kavanaugh is quoting Justice Kennedy's concurrence in the judgment in Simon & Schuster v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
However, beware, that unlike one in H-1B status who may be able to keep on applying for extensions under AC 21, the shelf life of the L-1A status is 7 years, and 5 years for the L-1B status, as AC21 does not apply to L-1s. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Despite the Supreme Court ruling in Radovich v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
§ 5-2-214). [4] Nat’l Ass’n of Industrial Bankers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
One does not develop a help desk from the bottom up--nor necessarily with a view to enlarging the primacy of human rights holders who tend to bear the consequences of adverse human rights impacts.[12] Instead, it tends to be more efficient to target those collective organs into which positive responsibility for the care and protection of human rights harms bearers authority are vested. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
But five justices had rejected that theory in Williams v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:59 pm
The first case, Braidwood Management v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
He is very good at what he does. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:59 pm
Another classmate, Emily Podolnick, responded to the Teitiota v. [read post]
