Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 13,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am
§102(a)(1) does not cover non-public uses or non-public sales,” and “otherwise available to the public” is an added “modifier . . . restrict[ing] the meaning of the preceding clause. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:29 pm
Moreover, while RMC 702 is silent on this issue, it does state that the accused does not have a right to attend a deposition. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
On May 29, 2018, under a new presidential administration, DHS published a proposed rule to rescind the IEP. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:43 pm
However, the disclaimer should not remove more than is necessary to restore novelty [2.3] In the present case, the disclaimer is based essentially on the disclosure of Claim 29 of D1. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:50 am
Specifically, CSX requested the DOL find that: (1) the plan is “unfunded” solely because the Plan permits employee-participants to elect to have payment of a stated percentage of their compensation deferred under the Plan; and (2) 29 CFR 2510.3-102 does not apply to amoounts of compensation subject to such deferral elections. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
This meant that, strictly speaking, A 102(1) EPC 1973 did not provide the legal basis for revoking the patent if the patent as amended did not meet, for example, the requirements of A 84 or A 123(3) or R 27 or R 29 EPC 1973. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:21 pm
Nelson stated that “[t]his is an extremely concerning call, because contacting the media does not provide whistleblowers with any legal protections – nor does it necessarily make them eligible for an award. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:00 am
Sacramento County also issued an amended order, which will be in effect from May 1 through May 22, 2020. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:31 pm
That means that the rule does not change (1) whether a small business subcontracting plan is required in the acquisition of commercial items, including commercially available off-the-shelf items, nor (2) does it expand the applicability of the small business subcontracting plan requirement to contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Tétreault, 2006 SCC 12, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 420. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 1:03 am
The DOF argued that their use was for research purposes and didn't therefore infringe Blaclock's rights.Section 29 was further expanded on in the milestone case of CCH (discussed more here), which set a two-part test on whether a use was protected by fair dealing: 1. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
Rather, the court will only issue a restraining order if it is “necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim from an immediate danger or to prevent further abuse. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:31 pm
(The FDIC does not identify the problem banks by name.) [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
The federal amendment raising the minimum wage to $5.85 does not go into effect until July 24th, 2007, and thus is not incorporated into the Indiana statute which is effective July 1, 2007, in my opinion. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
This decision aligns Idaho with other jurisdictions that have confronted the specific issue of paramour favoritism and ruled that paramour favoritism does not constitute gender discrimination because it affects both men and women equally. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:57 am
A 29-year-old Maryland man was tragically killed last week when he was ejected suddenly from the all-terrain vehicle he was riding and hit a concrete barrier It happened last Wednesday evening, on West Road in Salisbury. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
City of Banning, Case No. 460950 (Riverside County Superior Court, January 29, 2008)). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:26 pm
" 29 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:44 am
Read on… 1. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:06 pm
He does not intend to seek clemency from Gov. [read post]
