Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 1761 - 1780 of 4,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 6:26 am by Tobias Lutzi
Upon a first reading of the decision, four aspects may be noted: (1) The Court appears to have followed the AG’s proposition to adopt “a narrow and minimalist approach [to] this case” (Opinion, para 43). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:42 am by luiza
On June 7, 2023, the New York Senate passed S6748, sponsored by Senate Deputy Leader Michael Gianaris and introduced in the 2023-24 Legislative Session, by a vote of 43 to 18. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:20 pm
  A number of factors must be considered: 1. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 7:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Vidal, 43 F.4th 1207 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
The patentee also presented evidence of a 43% profit rate by the infringer — arguably sufficient for the jury to award a 12% royalty. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Or the court may simply render a judgment in favor of the judgment creditor directly against the garnishee (Reilly, CPLR Commentary, C5201:2; see also C5227:1). [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:17 am
 Subdivision 43(a)(1)(b) of the Lanham  Act requires that the confusing word or phrase be used “in commercial advertising or promotion. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The court then dismissed the §43(a)(1)(A) claim for the same failure to allege commercial use, and then §43(a)(1)(B) for the same reason, which I will pickily point out should have been a failure to allege competition/commercial advertising and promotion. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:22 am
If the settlements above $1 billion are removed, the average for the period 2003 to 2009 drops to $27.6 million, although the year to date average for 2009 settlements remains at $43 million. [read post]
Employers Are Not Authorized to Require that Employees Exhaust Leave for Reasons 1 through 7 before Using Leave for Reason 8 The bill does not require that employees exhaust SPSL for reasons 1 through 7 before the employee uses SPSL for reason 8.[27] 4. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 12:32 am
LEXIS 116648, at *43 (emphasis added). [read post]